Compare
Honest comparisons.
We build agent control — not every tool in the adjacent space does the same thing. Here is how ifivo stacks up against the tools teams actually evaluate, with honest sections on when the other one is the right call.
ifivo vs Galileo Agent Control
Read comparisonHosted control plane vs open-source framework
Galileo released an Apache-2.0 framework with Luna-2 SLMs for risk scoring. ifivo is a hosted control plane — approvals, Slack workflow, kill switch, ready by lunch.
ifivo vs Microsoft Agent Governance Toolkit
Read comparisonHosted control plane vs self-host toolkit
Microsoft's MIT-licensed toolkit is 7+ packages with deep policy languages and full OWASP coverage. ifivo trades forkability for a working approval UI, audit log, and no SRE burden.
ifivo vs LangSmith
Read comparisonAgent control plane vs LLM observability
LangSmith watches traces and runs evals. ifivo decides whether the action runs. Different layers — most mature teams end up with both.
Not sure which of these you need?
A shorthand: if you need approvals, a kill switch, and an audit log that finance or support can operate, start with ifivo. If you need prompt-level tracing and LLM evals, start with LangSmith. If you need open-source you run yourself inside a VPC, look at Galileo or MSAGT. Most teams past pilot run a combination.